<    March 2010    >
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
    1  2  3  4  5  6
 7  8  9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
01:43 rsim_ joined
01:48 myabc joined
01:50 <dbussink> yawniek: ah, yeah, i think i have it applied here locally, haven't pushed it yet though
02:19 <yawniek> ok, just wanted to know, if i can convice the others so that we use dm it would be handy to not need to have a extra gem
02:21 <yawniek> we cant upgrade bc our cms uses a table SQL and we only have binaries. really cool...
02:52 pietia joined
03:12 yawniek joined
03:34 snusnu joined
04:08 <dbussink> yawniek: could see if we could do a quick release, there are some other fixes in there that could be useful for people but i want to finish them first
04:15 solnic joined
04:24 myabc joined
04:59 <yawniek> no hurry for me
05:00 <yawniek> i just wanted to know if it every will be released. when is not that important
05:14 solnic joined
05:41 solnic_ joined
05:47 botanicus joined
06:12 snusnu joined
06:55 solnic joined
06:58 solnic left
07:01 solnic joined
09:24 github joined
09:24 <github> dm-more: master snusnu * 5024951 (1 files in 1 dirs): [dm-timestamps] require 'dm-core' because we need it - http://bit.ly/dqdl1e
09:24 github left
10:02 whoahbot joined
10:07 Rando joined
10:12 pietia joined
10:59 carllerche joined
11:34 benburkert joined
12:04 Rando_ joined
12:56 whoahbot joined
14:02 myabc joined
14:33 whoahbot joined
14:48 <dbussink> myabc: ping
15:09 <myabc> dbussink: pong
15:10 <dbussink> myabc: i was thinking about row_count in DO::Reader, to see whether we could perhaps make it optional
15:10 <dbussink> there were issue with supporting that in jruby right?
15:10 <myabc> dbussink: its not in our official API atm
15:11 <dbussink> yeah, i know, but got some questions about it
15:12 <myabc> dbussink: yep not all jdbc implementations will support it
15:12 <dbussink> myabc: well, not all is a lot better than none :)
15:12 <dbussink> myabc: do you know which ones will be problematic?
15:13 <myabc> dbussink: I think SQLite3 would be problematic
15:13 <myabc> dbussink: not sure about MySQL
15:13 <myabc> dbussink: PostgreSQL JDBC Impl. is pretty good + complete
15:13 <dbussink> myabc: well, frankly sqlite3 on jruby is problematic in general afaik
15:13 <myabc> http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/sql/ResultSet.html is what we'd use
15:14 <myabc> dbussink: sorry, scrollable ResultSets is what we'd use to implement this. I think pietia looked into this a while back too
15:14 <myabc> dbussink: v. true. its improved a little.. but is a not a v. complete JDBC implementation
15:16 <dbussink> myabc: well, i'd be willing to make sqlite3 on jruby divert for this
15:17 <myabc> dbussink: ok.. I'd actually be willing to fork /vendor sqlite3/work on sqlite3 upstream, if need be (at least later on, if there's demand)
15:18 <dbussink> myabc: well, for jruby there are also good alternatives with h2, hsqldb, etc.
15:18 <myabc> dbussink: yep..
15:18 <myabc> dbussink: just need to get the DM adapters written :)
15:28 <dbussink> myabc: hehe, yeah
15:29 <dbussink> myabc: but if you or pietia think it's doable, i probably want to add it back
15:29 <dbussink> it's easy for the c sqlite, mysql and postgres drivers
15:29 <myabc> dbussink: ok.. may I ask why?
15:29 <dbussink> myabc: well, people have been asking for getting it in
15:29 <myabc> dbussink: I do think its do-able for what is worth
15:29 <dbussink> and i'm open for it if it's doable
15:30 <myabc> dbussink: just last time around, there wasn't a strong use-case for it
15:30 <dbussink> myabc: yeah, true, but things might change :P
15:33 <myabc> dbussink: ok.. well go ahead and impement on the C side
15:33 <myabc> dbussink: and I'll try to keep up with you :)
15:34 <dbussink> but i'm heading off, ttyl!
15:37 whoahbot joined
15:42 hassox joined
15:43 <myabc> dbussink: ok.. np..
15:58 whoahbot joined
16:23 snusnu joined
16:55 benburkert joined
17:14 botanicus joined
20:19 carllerche joined
21:46 snusnu joined
22:03 hassox joined